Showing posts with label Unit 4. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Unit 4. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Local Government September Updates

Reminder: 2026 Midterm Elections in 60 Days!

Election Updates:

  • Early Voting starts September 24th! See Early Voting locations and times here at the Champaign County Clerk and Recorder's Website.

  • Illinois Public Media 2026 Candidate Interviews: in collaboration with the NAACP Champaign County Branch and the LWV of Champaign County.

  • LWV Local Candidate Guide: available through Vote411.

  • Reminder for the Next Election (It may be sooner than you think!): Municipal and many other local elections such as school board elections will be occurring early in 2027. The process to getting on that ballot has already begun. See the 2027 Abbreviated Election Calendar for more key dates and deadlines!


City of Champaign:

The City Council passed two major policy frameworks at their August 18th meeting:

I’m still looking into the changes made to the zoning code which the City Council replaced at the September 1st meeting.

There is a continuing campaign to get City support and funding towards a Champaign County Reparations Commission. This is being led by the CU Reparations Coalition.

Earlier last month there was a controversial special use permit that the City Council failed to approve for a commissary kitchen for local food trucks and catering business needs. The commissary kitchen would have been located in the North End and there was local pushback on that location. Approval required a supermajority vote, but the measure only had a simple majority in support.


Unit 4:

The Board of Education approved a ballot referendum on bonds towards new middle schools and other facilities improvements. This is following the findings and presentation of the facilities committee. The consent agenda also included details on repairing the Kenwood playground recently damaged in a fire.

There was a great deal of public participation at the August 17th Board of Education meeting, especially in regards to the implementation of the new enforcement process for residency and district boundaries.

Superintendent Ponce put out a public statement on the district’s appreciation of NAACP Champaign County Branch President Pearson and the NAACP's work towards addressing and resolving the registration issues moving forward. She also spoke at the August 17th meeting. Superintendent's statement from an email sent to the district after that meeting:


Charlisa Hart, a regular speaker during public comments at Unit 4 and other local government bodies, announced her candidacy for Board of Education in public comments. Four out of the seven school board seats are up for election during
next year’s municipal elections. There were an increased number of interruptions and outbursts from the audience throughout the course of the 3 hour meeting.

There's been continued calls for school board seats by sub-district in Unit 4, as opposed to only at-large members for the entire district. Smile Politely's Editorial Board appeared to give cautious support to the idea, noting that "we have seen how the neighborhood sub-district model hasn’t always worked for Urbana."


City of Urbana:

Grace Wilkins announced her resignation a couple months ago and that became official on August 24th The City of Urbana is now accepting applications for the vacancy, to be appointed by Mayor DeShawn Williams. The deadline for applying is 5 p.m. on Thursday, September 11, 2026. Residency and other requirements are listed on the application page here.

Last month’s political action report noted that there had been some audio issues with the City Council meetings. The technology team for the City found a workaround to avoid interruptions to livestreaming. There are still no real-time adjustments for some sound issues, but significant discrepancies can be adjusted afterward for the streaming / recording. There had been an announcement that council, board, and commission meetings would no longer be livestreamed due to those issues, but that appeared to have been released prematurely given the workaround.

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Local Government Updates


We'll be trying out a little bit of a new format to try to have more regular and concise updates moving forward.

General Updates:

Elections:

Election day for this year’s midterms is November 3rd, 2026, with Early Voting starting around October 24th. You can find the local primary election results here on the News-Gazette website. There are new local party chairs, with Urbana Mayor DeShawn Williams chairing the Champaign County Democrats and perennial local candidate Jeff Brownfield replacing Susan Mantell in the County GOP.  

Federal Changes / Local Impact:

So-called “work requirements” for food assistance are going into effect. Champaign County Health Care Consumers have a great deal of information and assistance available on how to navigate the new hurdles for those having to prove their eligibility, exemptions, etc.

Gun Violence: The latest updates, including the police chief updates, can usually be found at the monthly Community Coalition meetings available here. There has been a number of recent shootings, many involving minors, in recent weeks. Unsecured guns, lost or stolen from homes and vehicles here and across the country, appear to be a major source for guns used in these types of crimes. Sheriff Heuerman noted that in one recent car theft, at least two guns were taken from a local unlocked vehicle. As we have seen, time and time again, if someone wants a gun, they just have to check enough car door handles in any given parking lot or neighborhood.

There still remain severe challenges in ensuring school attendance across both local school districts here with dozens of kids in each at ongoing and regular risk. There was a detailed discussion on those challenges at the recent Race Relations Subcommittee of the Community Coalition last month.


Local Government Roundup:

Municipal / School Boards:

City of Champaign: The affordable housing crisis has been a longtime and ongoing issue for the C-U. According to the housing needs assessment report and presentation earlier this year, the City is expected to present “the final document to the stakeholders and to the City Council for approval and moving into the implementation of the Housing Needs Analysis and Strategy” this month. 

The annual township board blocked an agenda item for an advisory referendum related to a state law restricting boycotts of Israel. The same referendum passed in Cunningham township at their annual meeting and several other township meetings around the state.

Champaign Park District: The Champaign Parks Foundation is looking for four new members. This organization helps raise money for unmet needs of the park district itself. Elections for Champaign Park District commissioners occur staggered in odd election years, with two commissioner terms expiring in 2027.

City of Urbana: The Alternative Response Task Force (re: policing / 911 calls) had a community engagement event with video available on the Urbana Public TV YouTube page here. President Pearson has been actively working with the stakeholder meetings over the past several months, looking at various alternative response systems around the country and possible local implementations here.

Unit 4:  The Board of Education has approved some of the new cabinet members for the incoming new Superintendent, Dr. Geovanny Ponce, who will begin that role on July 1st of this year. The district approved a separation agreement with former Central High School Principle Montia Gardner, with both sides agreeing not to sue each other in the aftermath of the falling out in a short, but apparently contentious year.

The district renewed its contract for Student Resource Officers. The News-Gazette had details of the contract, including the limitations on officers to issue tickets and other issues here.

MTD: The C-U MTD board will likely have to redo its annexation votes for areas that would allow a link for local bus routes to Carle at the Fields in Southwest Champaign after a technical violation of state law that prohibits meetings on election day (one of the public hearings for the annexation fell on the day of the March primary).


Champaign County Government:

The County’s budget process has begun with the Budget Director’s financial forecast presentation at the April County Board meeting. The board is openly considering across-the-board cuts, especially in light of the recent voter referendum supporting cuts to staff and services and opposing any new tax revenues.

The long-delayed Fiscal Year 2024 Audit is still being processed by the external auditor (Clifton, Larson, Allen LLP). There was an update on that process at the last Committee of the Whole (page 54 of the agenda packet). In March there was a presentation on the history of audit issues that led to our current predicament (video and slides).

The expectation is that these continued delays will impact funding, with the county likely missing out on funding it may have otherwise qualified for (e.g. through the state and federal government). The work on the 2025 audit is also being delayed while the County attempts to complete the 2024 audit.

The County Board also passed a one year moratorium on massive “hyperscale” data centers, as part of a process that may lead to blocking their construction here completely. The centers tend to have massive electric and water needs. As the recent mapping of the Mahomet aquifer has confirmed, however, those impacts may still threaten Champaign County if one is built in neighboring counties.

Monday, September 9, 2024

Unit 4 Updates and SpEd Audit


This post covers the latest news on the district's upcoming Special Education audit and the settlement agreement that led to it. It also looks at some of the controversies on how we got here. Tonight's Board of Education meeting also includes an item to discuss reorganization again. That and other updates are discussed below.

 

SpEd Audit:

The biggest news out of Unit 4 this month was the Special Education (SpEd) Audit Agreement being approved by the board. WCIA had coverage earlier this month at the August 20th special meeting:

After a settlement, the Champaign School District will undergo an audit of their special education programs.

The audit will be done by Dan Cates, a former superintendent with expertise on special education, with oversight from attorney Neil Takkif.

The Board of Education approved of its authorization at their special meeting Tuesday night, with four members voting for the settlement including the audit and three members abstaining.

Julie Duvall, the CU Autism Network executive director, said the district needs to be transparent and able to handle tough conversations in order to improve their special education programs. She also said SPED students and their families should be able to weigh in on the audit and eventually see the final results.

That full article and video segment here. Some key details of the audit are now publicly available on the district's website in tonight's school board agenda packet:

The audit shall specifically address the following areas for the school year of 2023-24 and first semester of the 2024-25:

a. Continuum of special education placement options and appropriate determinations of LRE for students, including provision of supplementary aids, curriculum, and services to ensure ability to participate in regular education to the extent practicable;

b. Special education programming compliance with age range requirements and class size requirements;

c. Adequacy of special education transportation and supervision, including means of transportation and average travel times for students, and student safety;

d. Special education personnel staff development;

e. Special education personnel substitute qualifications and training;

f. Related services adequacy;

g. Facilities adequacy for special education programming;

h. Special education records maintenance and information confidentiality compliance;

i. Coordination with private providers for special education students;

j. Administrative oversight of special education best practices;

k. Hiring policies, practices, procedures, and training for special education personnel,

l. Parent communication and coordination of special education services, and

m. District Title I spending plan

Dr. Cates shall submit an initial report by March 1, 2025, but that final completion of the audit may extend as Dr. Cates finds appropriate to complete the full scope of the audit. At the conclusion of the audit, Dr. Cates will publish a public report on best practice findings and recommendations and will provide the public with a presentation on these findings at a board meeting. The District has permission to facilitate a dedicated webpage of Dr. Cates’ findings.

Dr. Cates shall review the implementation of recommendations within two years of his final report and will produce a written document and public report regarding the District’s implementation of final audit recommendations or lack thereof.

This is from "Exhibit A" (starting on page 7 of the PDF file) of the Cate's agreement executing part of the settlement approved last month by the Board of Education. 

Previously, there have been some prolonged fights over board agendas revolving around items and "agreements" being added that appeared to be in conflict with the actual settlement terms. For example, if one compares this to the bizarre "agreement" from last month, one can now see that it did not reflect the full scope of the settlement terms.

In hindsight, with more of the details of the actual agreement public and confirmed, it raises serious questions about why incomplete and apparently erroneous executing agreements kept being put on the agenda... for a settlement that was still in the process of being approved.

My questions to the board leadership, district, and administrators involved in the process went unanswered. It is unclear if there is a reasonable explanation for what might be charitably seen as "bad optics," or if this indicates a more deliberate attempt to torpedo the settlement agreement during the process. 

I also received no response about growing public concerns that the district's legal team is being weaponized for factional or political ends. This is a concern that predates these public facing documents and board actions with the settlement agreement, including by one of the board members themselves.


Details of the public portions of the final agreement were difficult to find until this month. While the settlement agreement has been approved, the individual contracts related to it still have to be approved. Prior to this, almost everything occurred within closed "Executive Session" portions of school board meetings. Board member Betsy Holder explained her view of the agreement and when the public portions of that agreement will become available:

In a somewhat unprecedented settlement situation, a family in the community sacrificed their own personal and monetary settlement interests on behalf of their child in exchange for the terms of this audit moving for district wide change to help the entire SPED community. I am cautiously optimistic that this is the start of a path moving forward. This is not a forward facing document, but once it is executed it will be available via FOIA. It will govern the terms of the contracts with Dr. Cates and Neil Takiff.

This is a comment from a public social media post and a generally positive review of the board's actions and behavior at the previous special meeting. Social media posts and friends of the family have appeared to confirm that the family at the heart of this complaint and settlement was board member Amy Armstrong. It's not clear why other board members (Baker and Vazquez) abstained from voting for or against the settlement too. 

It passed 4-0-3 (for / against / abstentions) with the support of Bruce Brown. who had generally been aligned with Baker and Vazquez on other contentious issues before the board lately.


Reorganization Discussion:

During the controversy of how new members would be appointed to the Board of Education in light of two resignations, there was talk amongst board members about reorganization after the appointment process played out. This was complicated at the time by the fact that one of the resignations was by the board vice president Jamar Brown. A previous Cheat Sheet covered some of the controversy about elected a new vice president prior to having a full board to vote on the issue. The News-Gazette had an article about the walk-outs and quorum denying tactics surrounding the issue at the time.

Eventually the Board voted to make board member and board parliamentarian Heather Vazquez also the Vice-President of the board. 

More recent discussions about board reorganization have also been heated, with the Board President and Vice President accusing a newly appointed member of attempting a takeover, with designs on becoming the new Board president himself. Other arguments have revolved around whether reorganization was part of the detente that ensured a quorum and the vote for Vice-President while the board was still dealing with two vacancies earlier in the year.

Those recent discussions mostly took place at the contentious August 12th Board meeting around the 1:28 mark (agenda packets available here, video here). Banks, for his part denied any desire to become the president and explained that he felt misrepresented. A distinction was made between the president, who had been voted on by a previous full board and the decisions made about other board officers during vacancies. 

There have been arguments about whether the law and district policy allow for reorganization. I can't speak on the merits of the legal arguments, but others have noted other similar scenarios throughout the state over the years. It may come down to how a majority of the board decides to proceed and then whether anyone chooses to take the disagreement to court. I'll leave it to the reader and the lawyers to draft their own opinions and legal interpretations, however.


July Meeting:

The News-Gazette coverage had some brief highlights of the July meeting here. The censure drafted by the President and district lawyers appears to have been dropped from the agenda (and I haven't heard it raised again since). 

The July meeting (video here) began with a discussion and debate about the agenda as well, also revolving around disagreement on reorganization. The board began Executive (closed) session without approving the agenda (having failed the initial vote). This did not make any sense to me at the time, as going into Executive Session is an item to be carried out on the agenda itself.  The board came out of closed session and immediately returned back to approving the agenda.

The second agenda discussion added to confusion about whether they were passing an agenda as amended by the president (although there did not appear to be a motion or vote to amend it first). The removed item was 6. E. the appointment of a parliamentarian alone (as opposed to a broader reorganization of the board officers). The board then returned to Executive (closed) session after resolving the agenda issue. 

The public portion of the Board of Education meeting finally began at 6:42pm and adjourned at 8:37pm. The News-Gazette overview mentioned above was concise about the arguments raised during this meeting. The discussion about a "risk management committee" began around the 1:19 mark of the video and went on for about 40 minutes. President baker was opposed to the idea, while member Banks assured this was about ensuring the Board of Education has the information it needs and that there's nothing "nefarious" about the proposal.

Board communications began with a statement by Heather Vazquez admonishing people to not simply refer to board members by their surname, e.g. Baker as opposed to Dr. Baker. Communications got heated again towards the end after member Holder took issue with her husband being brought into the board's disagreements. She accused some of trying to interfere with her livelihood and work clients.

There was a brief special meeting earlier in July that was just to confirm recent hires in a timely manner. This is pretty common for school districts that generally only have one regular meeting in July (as opposed to two during school semesters). Agenda packets can be found on the district's website here.


Other Unit 4 Related News:

  • A critical perspective on BTW after the previous school administrators were removed by the district, from the News-Gazette. There was also an update on the litigation by the former Assistant Principal Rebecca Ramey here.

  • The board president wrote another column on navigating school board policy in the News-Gazette. Board member Bruce Brown wrote an opinion piece hoping the board could focus on the needs of the district and students. A Unit 4 graduate and now Unit 4 parent wrote an opinion piece calling for reorganization.

  • There was an article in the News-Gazette explaining the growing costs of MTD bus service for the district.

  • Tonight's meeting will also have a presentation on the the Affirmative Action / Equal Employment Opportunity audit on diversity and hiring goals within the district. The report showed positive gains in diverse employment goals by the district and is available here. There were other hiring updates in the news last month here and here.

  • There was a general update in the News-Gazette on area Student Resource Officer collaborations between police departments and school districts, including cost figures for Unit 4.

  • A former Unit 4 Board of Education member was caught up in the arrests of campus protesters. There were several arrests over the summer related to the protests that occurred on the University of Illinois campus during the Spring 2024 semester. Updates on those charges and concerns about the "mob action" law being used is available on the County Cheat Sheet page here.

  • A 13 year old student appears to have been charged with the recent threats to district schools, according to the News-Gazette.

  • There appeared to be some ongoing delays with late registration according to WCIA.

Saturday, June 8, 2024

Unit 4 Updates: Board Appointments


The Regional Office of Education appointed two new members to the Unit 4 Board of Education to fill two vacancies due to resignations. This was after months of disagreements on the process with the remaining board members. The News-Gazette had an overview of the process and the appointed officials last week last week:

The retired CEO of the Don Moyer Boys & Girls Club and a local business owner who ran in the last election will fill the two vacant seats on the Champaign school board.

Regional Superintendent Gary Lewis brought an end to a monthslong saga Friday when he announced the selection of Sam Banks and Mark Holm to fill the seats vacated in March by Jamar Brown and Mark Thies.

They’re short-term positions, expiring in April, when the seats currently held by board President Gianina Baker, Heather Vazquez and Bruce Brown will also be on the election ballot.

That full article here (and some previous coverage of the Regional Office's process here and here). Illinois Public Media had similar coverage here and WCIA also had brief coverage on the new appointments.

A lot has happened since our last Unit 4 update in early April. At that time we had a Cheat Sheet post laying out the controversies heading into the local appointment process. That process fell apart as disagreements arose between two board members and a three member majority of the remaining (five of seven) Unit 4 Board of Education members. There was an initial meeting establishing some details of the appointment process, but that fell apart when the remaining process details were decided by the Board President without an additional public meeting of the Board.

The dispute resulted in the minority members using the parliamentary tactic of blocking a quorum to delay the process so that the Regional Office of Education would have to take over the process. From the News-Gazette last month:

The saga that has been the Champaign school board since two members resigned in frustration two weeks apart in March is about to enter a new phase — a do-over in the effort to find replacements for Jamar Brown and Mark Thies.

As was expected and is mandated by state statute, Regional Superintendent of Schools Gary Lewis — not the five remaining members of the Unit 4 board — will assume control of the process starting Monday, which will mark 60 days since Brown stepped away.

That full article here with a lot of additional information on the disputes. Some of the clashes appeared to go beyond process and policy and into the personal. The News-Gazette reported on the Superintendent's correspondence that the disagreements arise from "sheer hate," while others point to her remarks as exemplifying the leadership issues they're taking issues with.


There has been heated debate among local activists, especially many within the local Black community, about the role of white supremacy and racism in the criticisms of the Black women leaders of Unit 4 as Superintendent and the Board of Education president. This has been especially directed at the Unit 4 Families for a Smarter Solution group that formed during the last Unit 4 "Schools of Choice" reorganization proposals. Some local media has viewed the group as having both valid concerns, but also some arguably problematic ones. Another local media outlet has depicted the group as anti-desegregation or anti-equity, which appears to be strongly disputed within the group's facebook page.

There is a local history of school segregation and reactionary politics against reforms and desegregation efforts here, but the degree to which the past is replaying a role in the current situation, I leave to the reader to determine. One can find much agreement, at least in principle, on many of the desegregation and equity goals among the opposing factions (both on the Board and their constituents).

There appears to be a general consensus that the district is facing ongoing and persistent problems that pre-date the current Black leadership of the district, but there is a dispute about how much opposition is reasonable versus a racial double-standard. 

The newly appointed school board members will be sworn in at the next Unit 4 Board of Education meeting on June 10th.


Cell Phones:

The News-Gazette also highlighted various local and area policies on cell phones in schools. It also published a variety of views on the issues and complications involved with setting a cell phone policy in public schools as part of its Meeting Minutes feature. An excerpt from the article from a local Unit 4 parent and activist, Rita Conerly:

As a mom, having my older kids carry a cellphone to school is important to me for several reasons.

Firstly, it provides a means of communication in case of emergencies or unexpected changes in plans. Secondly, it allows me to stay in touch with them throughout the day, ensuring their safety and well-being. Additionally, having a cellphone can facilitate learning by providing access to educational resources.

That full article here. This follows a previous Meeting Minutes article looking at the district cell phone policies last month here.


Gun Violence Reduction Blueprint Funds:

There was a bit of an update last month on the City of Champaign's additional ARPA funding to the school district to collaborate on programs looking to deal with gun violence and its underlying causes from WCCU:

In 2022, Unit 4 was offered over $526,000 through the blueprint to fund their own gun violence prevention programs. But in September of 2023, the City of Champaign shared that the Unit 4 school district turned down the money. Unit 4 at the time said they turned down the money to focus on academic and social emotional support.

That changed shortly after a shooting right next door to Booker T. Washington Elementary School this fall. The shooting left parents asking Unit 4 why they had not taken money for gun violence reduction from the City.

In December of 2023, Unit 4 ended up taking money from the Gun Violence Reduction Blueprint, though for a lesser amount than the original contract. The original contract gave the Unit 4 school district $526,620 to use towards gun violence reduction programs. However, the new proposal with a $91,000 reduction brings the district's new total to $435,000.

That full article here. WCCU had a recent article on ongoing concerns about gun violence near Booker T. Washington school here.


Other Unit 4 News:

Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Unit 4 Special Meeting and Updates

 
Photos provided by Natalie Schneider

Heads Up! There is a Special Meeting of the Champaign Schools Unit 4 Board of Education next week on April 9th to interview applicants for the two vacancies on the same school board.  There were 26 applicants for the two vacancies according to the News-Gazette (WCIA coverage here). After our last Unit 4 updates in March looked at the controversies surrounding the district and the resignation of board vice president Jamar Brown, there was an addition resignation of another board member. From the News-Gazette last month:

For the second time in two weeks and a day, a Champaign school board member has resigned after serving less than a year in office.

On March 4, it was Jamar Brown, who said months of “mistrust, missteps and misinformation” had left him seeing “no value” in continuing.

Tuesday night, it was a similarly frustrated Mark Thies, who in a letter to board members and Superintendent Shelia Boozer said he’s come to realize ”that my vision is not aligned with the future direction and initiatives of Unit 4.”

That full article here including some details of Thies' resignation letter that mirrored Jamar Brown's concerns about a lack of respect and trust. WCIA had the full text of Thies' resignation letter here. WCCU had some responses from parents as well here. WCCU had an additional interview with board member Betsy Holder about her concerns with the district and a response from Board President Dr. Gianina Baker.

Next week there is a regular school board meeting scheduled on Monday evening, as well as an additional special meeting for interviewing applicants for the board's vacancy on the next evening on Tuesday.


More March Meetings:

Since our last update there was a March 20th special meeting to address the process of appointing people to the two open seats on the board (video here, agendas here). There was a number of public comments before the board president laid out that process. The timeline and other details were discussed and agreed to by the remaining board members. WCIA's coverage of that meeting is here. WAND's coverage specifically covered the citizen complaints and concerns about transparency here.

There was another regular meeting that was cancelled shortly after it began on March 25th. This caused a great deal of confusion for members of the public who found themselves locked out of the building. While the meetings begin at 5pm, there is a closed session at the beginning of Champaign board of education meetings to discuss employment and disciplinary issues. The main public portion of the meeting generally doesn't start until after 6pm.

The very beginning of the meetings, before entering the closed "executive session" is technically public, but it is generally not included in the meeting videos. Few (if any) members of the public show up for the brief call to order and vote to go into the closed session, which would also mean waiting for an hour or more in an empty room while the board meets privately.

The News-Gazette had coverage on the walk outs and confusion after the meeting.

Amy Armstrong said she’d asked twice in the past six days — once in a meeting, then again in a Monday morning email to President Gianina Baker — that the item calling for the special election of a new board vice president be tabled until the board was back to full strength.

When Baker declined to pull it at the start of Monday’s meeting, Armstrong walked out, followed by fellow member Betsy Holder.

With only three members left at the Mellon Administrative Center — Baker, Heather Vazquez and Bruce Brown — the meeting was called off for lack of a quorum... 

But with no meeting, there was no public comment session, leaving them to air their frustrations outside. 

That full article here. WCIA had similar coverage and explanation of events:

The seven-person board currently has two vacancies. With less than four members, the board cannot meet in order to be compliant with Illinois’ Open Meetings Act.

The two members, Amy Armstrong and Betsy Holder, walked out of the meeting after Armstrong objected to the agenda since it contained an item for electing a new Vice President. Jamar Brown, who served as vice president, resigned from the board earlier this month.

Only three members were in attendance after Holder and Armstrong left. With no way to continue, the meeting was cancelled.

That full article here. According to at least one of the school board members that walked out on social media afterwards: the doors had been unlocked for the public at 5pm and members of the public were inside when the initial open session was called to order. There appears to be questions as to what exactly the quorum rules dictated if the meeting began with a quorum, but no longer had one afterward. For example, could there have been public comment, even if there weren't enough members present to vote on action items. A hurdle there would be whether or not they could even approve the agenda to get to that point.


Other Updates on Unit 4 Controversies:

Wednesday, March 6, 2024

Unit 4 Controversies


 

This post has the latest updates on the controversies surrounding Unit 4 and recent meeting coverage from February and early March with the Board of Education. See also our previous Cheat Sheet post on Unit 4 updates over the past several months. It covers many presentations on programs that are working (and possibly expanding), transportation challenges, and Illinois State Board of Education and other data on test scores and various achievement gaps.


Booker T. Washington Leadership Change:

There are a lot of unknowns, speculation, and rumors about what may or may not be happening to the school administrators at Booker T. Washington school. News-Gazette Editor Jeff D'Alessio laid out some of the challenges in reporting on the subject in an WDWS interview (about 45 minutes into the Penny for Your Thoughts podcast), especially when the district refuses to comment on personnel matters. 

The one thing D'Alessio seemed sure about is that a decision for a leadership change has been made by Unit 4 at BTW. The BTW Principal, Jamie Roundtree, has now hired an attorney over the issue, according to WAND. Vice Principal Rebecca Ramey is the other BTW administrator caught up in the possible leadership change.


Rallies and Clashing Views on Superintendent:

The February Board of Education meeting was preceded by a rally outside of the administration building in support of Booker T. Washington school administrators believed to be being removed (at least from that particular school). Coverage of the rally and concerns is available from the News-Gazette, WCCU, and WAND respectively. 

Supporters of Superintendent Sheila Boozer derided the rally as part of efforts to remove the current Superintendent as opposed to the stated goals of protecting BTW administrators. A local social media group appears to have been the target of some of the complaints. Links to a separate Change.org online petition criticizing and calling for the firing of the Superintendent were also shared there.

Imani Bezzell, a long-time local activist and supporter of reforms at Unit 4, led the public comment portion of the meeting off with a passionate defense of the Superintendent matched with a condemnation of the rally goers. She stated up front that she arranged to have unlimited time with the school board. The microphone typically switches off shortly after the 3 minute clock runs out and the camera shifts away from the public speaker's podium back to the board. When this occurred for Bezzell the Board President, Dr. Gianna Baker, had the the microphone turned back on and the camera angle turned back to the Superintendent's supporter.

This caused some confusion and anger as later speakers (including administration critics) were admonished by the board parliamentarian and some of the Superintendent's supporters in the audience for going over their time later during the public comment period. While some government bodies may, with a vote, "suspend the rules" to allow longer speaking time for public participants, the Unit 4 board rules allow the board president to unilaterally make such an allowance, even for a single individual (see Unit 4 Policies section 2:230).

The meeting video is available here, with Unit 4 school board agendas and related documents available here. It was another long meeting with a couple of important presentations in the middle again. Here are the video timestamps:

  • Superintendent's Report began the meeting.

  • First Public Comment began at 14:25.

  • Appointment of Director of Custodial/Grounds intro, approval, comments at 1:07:00.

  • Reports:
    • Operation Hope report at 1:11:40.
    • LIFT report at 1:48:50.

  • New Business / Action Items voted on at 2:41:40.

  • 2nd Round of Public Comment began at 3:13:15.

  • Board comments at 3:25:30.


Contentious March Meeting:

The first Unit 4 meeting of March (video, agenda packets) also had more contentious moments and (the public portion) ended with the resignation of board member Jamar Brown and some heartfelt statements on that by other board members. WCIA had coverage specifically of that resignation here. The board is responsible for filling the vacancy in the next couple months. WCIA had a short blurb on the district's statement on the resignation and filling the vacancy here.

WCIA also had a write-up and overview of the March 4th meeting here. Excerpt:

he Champaign Board of Education hosted its bimonthly meeting on Monday. Among other things, the board discussed liability insurance, construction bids and the purchase of outdoor digital marquee signs for schools.

However, the meeting was marked with a heated discussion between two members and came to a shocking and emotional end when a board member resigned...

The board deliberated on lowering an insurance limit for parents and guardians who have to take their children to school due to unreliable bus service. An agreement allows for parents and guardians to be reimbursed for any expenses related to this transportation as long as parents and guardians have auto insurance that pays no less than $100,000 for bodily injury and property damage...

However, the proposal did not pass after a deadlocked vote.

That full meeting write-up here. The News-Gazette also had coverage of the resignation and meeting:

A meeting that opened with Superintendent Shelia Boozer’s customary slideshow, ticking off all the reasons why “it’s a great day day in Unit 4,” ended with one board member expressing disappointment in what she called the district’s “lack of transparency,” another announcing his resignation less than a year after being elected and a third questioning her own future...

“After my first term, I dubbed that experience as ‘the best thing that I’d never wanted to do,’” Brown said. “Unfortunately, the second time around, I cannot say I’m having the same experience. This time around has been filled with mistrust, missteps and misinformation. During this time, the school board has taken much criticism over many different topics from various stakeholders. Some of it was warranted, some of it was not and there’s even some that’s been self-inflicted.”

That full article here. Another excerpt from Jamar Brown's resignation from WCIA:

"The district’s decision to not maintain a level of humility, compassion, and adjustability has forced us to focus on adult-orient issues instead of student’ centered ones that could help raise reading and math scores and comprehension, the ones that ensure that every child in our district is seen, heard and respected and the one where we asses ourselves to make sure we have the right people in the right position where they can thrive and in turn pass that along to our students. So because of this, I no longer see value in continuing in this capacity. So please accept this as my resignation from the Champaign Unit 4 Board of Education effective today, at the conclusion of open session."

This meeting was originally rescheduled from the end of last month due to a lack of quorum (enough members able to attend to carry out official board duties). During the school year the board typically meets on both the 2nd and 4th Mondays of the month. This added to some concerns by one side of the insurance liability issue (that failed in a 3-3 tie vote) that the long delayed item was voted on when one of the supporters of changing the policy was absent.


Other Unit 4 Updates: